0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÀ±Þ½Ç ÁßÁõµµ ºÐ·ù °£È£»çÀÇ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤°úÁ¤¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³­ »ç°íÀü·«: ¼Ò¸®³»¾î »ý°¢Çϱâ

Thinking Strategies of Triage Nurses¡¯ Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Think Aloud Study

ÁßȯÀÚ°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2016³â 9±Ç 1È£ p.15 ~ 26
KMID : 1221920160090010015
¹®¼±Èñ ( Moon Sun-Hee ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

¹Ú¿¬È¯ ( Park Yeon-Hwan ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify thinking strategies in the complicated decision-making process based on real patient-based data of triage nurses in the emergency department (ED).

Methods: This study used the ¡¯think aloud¡¯ method to collect data from 8 triage nurses from one general hospital ED in South Korea. The data were analyzed with protocol analysis using thinking strategies.

Results: The triage process was divided into three stages. The first stage consisted of 8 thinking strategies, including searching for information. They used intuition based on directly observed concepts for identifying a crisis. The second stage consisted of 17 thinking strategies related to the decision-making process. They assessed patients and generated a hypothesis to try to understand their health problems through analytic thinking. The third stage consisted of 10 thinking strategies, including qualifying. They considered the situation of the ED and properly triaged the patients. During the triage process, they frequently used judging the value and searching for information on 17 thinking strategies.

Conclusions: Triage nurses demonstrated various connected thinking strategies for each stage. Based on our results, further studies should be done to develop a triage education program.
KeyWords
ÁßÁõµµ ºÐ·ù °£È£»ç, ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤, »ç°íÀü·«, ¼Ò¸®³»¾î »ý°¢Çϱâ, ÇÁ·ÎÅäÄÝ ºÐ¼®¹ý
Triage nurse, Decision-making, Thinking strategies, Think aloud, Protocol analysis
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)